Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; September 2009; v. 14; issue. p. 115-127; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG14.3.115
© 2009 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casto, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Interpreting Surface-wave Data for a Site with Shallow Bedrock

Daniel W. Casto1, Barbara Luke2, Carlos Calderón-Macías3 and Ronald Kaufmann1

1 Technos, Inc. 10430 NW 31st Terrace, Doral, Fl. 33172info{at}technos-inc.com
2 Applied Geophysics Center, University of Nevada Las Vegas 4505 Maryland Parkway Box 454015, Las Vegas, Nv. 89154
3 ION-GX Technology 2105 Cit West Blvd., Building III, Suite 900, Houston, Tex. 77042

The inversion of dispersive Rayleigh-wave data has been shown to be successful in providing reliable estimated shear-wave velocities within unconsolidated materials in the near surface. However, in a case where the multi-channel analysis of surface waves method was applied to a site consisting of clay residuum overlying basalt bedrock, inversion for the fundamental-mode Rayleigh wave resulted in shear-wave velocities within the rock that are less than half of expected values. Forward modeling reveals that the fundamental-mode dispersion curve is hardly sensitive to bedrock velocity perturbations over a practical range of wavelengths, leading to poorly constrained solutions. Standard surface-wave methods can fail because of a shortage of phase-velocity estimates at the low frequencies that are necessary to properly constrain shear-wave velocities at depth. The commonly used guideline that maximum investigation depth is roughly half of the largest recorded wavelength can be misleading. Data at much lower frequencies (i.e., longer wavelengths) than typically acquired might be required to obtain a meaningful shear-wave velocity profile, particularly for a site with a high-velocity half-space beneath a low-velocity layer. For such cases, layer geometry appears to have a large impact on inversion results. Consequently, Rayleigh-wave methods can be effective in determining depth to bedrock in simple, layered geologies (e.g., soft sediment over hard bedrock) when independent information of shear-wave velocity is available. Analysis techniques that address higher modes of Rayleigh-wave propagation may be useful for more accurately resolving depth and velocity of a high-velocity half-space. In the studied case, higher modes can theoretically reach the asymptotic high-velocity limits within the range of recorded frequencies.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society