Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; June 2008; v. 13; issue. p. 85-97; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG13.2.85
© 2008 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanli, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Image Reconstruction in Seismic and Medical Tomography

Ali Ismet Kanli

Istanbul University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geophysical Engineering 34320, Avcilar, Istanbul-Turkey kanli{at}istanbul.edu.tr

Tomography has been used for more than 40 yr in medical science and its success is well known. One of the most important reasons for the success of medical tomography compared to seismic tomography is the data-acquisition geometry. A data-acquisition geometry similar to the one used in medical tomography was designed and tested with synthetic geological models. Geophysical-type data-acquisition geometries were also applied to the geological models, and the resulting images were compared to the medical images. The reconstructed image obtained in the medical case resembled the synthetic geological model and had higher resolution than the geophysical image. Secondary attention is drawn to the determination of the differences between the low- and high-velocity zones in the final image reconstruction of the tomographic inversion process. Therefore, the step-like high- and low-velocity embedded layer models were tested with different spreading systems. The geological models were also tested with one-dimensional (1-D) initial velocity models to understand the effect of the initial velocity model on the final image reconstruction. In the high-velocity layer case, the tomographic process is quite successful in image reconstruction, but cannot achieve the same success in the low-velocity layer case.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society