Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; June 2008; v. 13; issue. p. 57-68; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG13.2.57
© 2008 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Long, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Assessment of an MASW Approach Incorporating Discrete Particle Modeling

Shane Donohue and Michael Long

School of Architecture, Landscape and Civil Engineering, University College Dublin (UCD) Newstead building, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4 Ireland shane.donohue{at}ucd.ie

A Discrete Particle Scheme (DPS) consisting of interacting circular particles is utilized to examine a popular Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) approach. Synthetic earth models of various complexity are generated using the DPS and analyzed by selected MASW dispersion and inversion techniques. For simple two layer and multilayer models where velocity increases with depth, inversion using the dominant fundamental mode results in MASW profiles of shear wave velocity (Vs) that closely match the true synthetic Vs profiles. Inversion using the default parameters produces gradational increases in velocity, rather than true discontinuities. When tested on a multilayer model containing a low velocity layer (LVL), inversion using a fundamental mode assumption results in a moderate increase in error.

MASW field tests at a highly uniform site in Norway (Onsøy) and a site with distinctive layer boundaries in Ireland (Ballinasloe) result in highly repeatable profiles of Vs. Resolution of dispersion curves at low frequencies (<10 Hz) is a problem at the Ballinasloe test site, which limits the depth of penetration of the technique. MASW inversion results compare excellently with downhole seismic cone tests at the Onsøy test site and reasonably with a seismic refraction survey at the Ballinasloe site.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society