Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; September 2007; v. 12; issue. p. 267-279; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG12.3.267
© 2007 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuras, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lala, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Capacitive Resistivity Imaging with Towed Arrays

Oliver Kuras1, Philip I. Meldrum, David Beamish, Richard D. Ogilvy and Deepak Lala

British Geological Survey Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG United Kingdom

The capacitive resistivity (CR) technique is a generalization of the conventional DC resistivity method that facilitates measurements of electrical resistivity on engineered surfaces and highly resistive ground. The CR methodology allows the use of towed sensor arrays, thus enabling the rapid collection of high-resolution resistivity data. Under quasi-static conditions, CR data are equivalent to galvanic DC measurements so that CR datasets can be interpreted with conventional DC inversion algorithms. In this study, we demonstrate that the methodology and fundamental parameters of the CR technique facilitate spatial sampling at the centimeter scale for towing speeds of the order of 2.5 km/h. We argue that the dipole-dipole array is the most suitable geometry for dynamic CR measurements and present example data acquired with a prototype instrument using plate-wire combinations arranged in an equatorial geometry. The information content of raw CR data is found to be dominant over towing-induced noise and a direct comparison with DC profile data shows good agreement between both techniques. Based on these findings, we show that tomographic imaging is possible using datasets acquired with moving arrays. Closer investigation of the practical aspects of towed-array capacitive resistivity imaging (CRI) highlights the similarities with galvanic multi-electrode surveys, but the different geometric constraints and sampling regime of CRI give rise to advantages (high lateral resolution) as well as disadvantages (limitations in vertical resolution). We conclude our study with recommendations for practical CRI survey procedures and present a field example where we have successfully imaged a subsurface target in 3D. Towed-array CRI is found to provide equivalent (and in some ways superior) information about the shallow subsurface when compared to DC ERT (electrical resistivity tomography); it therefore widens the scope of electrical imaging surveys to environments where the conventional methodology would be impractical.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society