Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; June 2007; v. 12; issue. p. 163-171; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG12.2.163
© 2007 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turesson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Comparative Analysis of the Multi-Offset Ground-Penetrating Radar and Shear-Wave Reflection Methods

Anita Turesson

Department of Geology, Earth Sciences Centre, Göteborg University Box 460, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden

Ground penetrating radar and shear-wave reflection methods were used to characterize the shallow subsurface. Both methods were compared at a site in south western Sweden. The site, which consists of a 150 m long profile, was chosen based on existing site information from previous studies. The shallow subsurface consists mainly of sediments of sand and clay. Ground penetrating radar methods, using common-offset and multi-offset techniques, in combination with common midpoint processing, were compared regarding resolution and depth penetration. It is shown that the latter strategy provides more distinct reflections and allows a deeper range of interpretable reflectors. The shear-wave reflection method images overlapping and deeper parts of the section which are below the depth range resolved by the radar waves. The study shows that by combining information from ground penetrating radar and shear-wave reflection surveys, a more complete analysis of subsurface geology can be conducted. Also in conductive environments, the shear-wave reflection method offers a possible alternative to ground-penetrating radar.

Key Words: Multi-offset ground-penetrating radar • shear-wave reflection • sand • clay







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society