Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; June 2006; v. 11; issue. p. 151-156; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG11.2.151
© 2006 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Application of EM Methods for the Investigation of Qiyueshan Tunnel, China

Lanfang He *, Minghai Feng **, Zhanxiang He * and Xuben Wang {dagger}

*BGP, China National Petroleum Corporation, BGP, Non-seismic, P.O. Box 11 Zhuozhou, Hebei Province, P.R. China 072751
**Economic Project Institute of China Railway, Fuxing road 10, Beijing, P.R. China 100844
{dagger}Chengdu University of Technology, College of Information Technology, Chengdu, P.R. China

A successful case history of applying the high-frequency passive source electromagnetic (EM) method and controlled-source audiomagnetotellurics (CSAMT) to investigate the Qiyueshan (Q) Tunnel route is presented in this paper. The high-frequency EM system (EH-4, with frequency range from 90 KHz to 12.8 Hz) and the CSAMT system (V6-A Multipurpose Receiver, with frequency range from 8,192 Hz to 0.125 Hz) were used for the data acquisition. The orthogonal components of the electromagnetic field were measured in the high frequency EM method, while scalar measurements of the electrical and magnetic field components were used in the CSAMT method. The relevant electrical properties of the earth were extracted from the electromagnetic profiles. High frequency EM has high resolution in the shallow earth but a smaller depth of exploration, while the CSAMT method has a powerful signal but a lower resolution in the shallow earth. The integration of the two methods might be effective for the survey of the deep tunnel route. Q Tunnel, located in central south China, has a length of 10 km and a depth of up to 900 m. Half of the tunnel goes through karst terrain, where the geologic structures are very complex, due to cavities, underground rivers and faults. The EM mapping results distinguish the electrical resistivity of different rock formations. Five low-resistivity areas and four high-resistivity areas were found and nine faults were verified by the EM method. These findings were very useful for the later engineering design.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society