Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; September 2005; v. 10; issue. p. 323-334; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG10.3.323
© 2005 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, C.B.
Right arrow Articles by Ivanov, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Combined Use of Active and Passive Surface Waves

C.B. Park1,*, R.D. Miller1, N. Ryden2, J. Xia1 and J. Ivanov1

1 Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kan. 66047-3726
* park{at}kgs.ku.edu
2 Dept. of Engineering Geology, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, Lund, Sweden

With a surface wave method to estimate shear-wave velocity (Vs) from dispersion curve(s) of known mode(s), accurate modal identification is obviously a crucial issue. In this regard, the dispersion imaging method is an essential processing tool as it can unfold the multi-modal nature of surface waves through direct wavefield transformations. When a combined dispersion curve of an extended frequency range is prepared from analyses of both passive and active surface waves attempting to increase the maximum depth of Vs estimation, the modal nature of the passive curve (as well as the active one) must be assessed although it has usually been considered the fundamental mode. We report two experimental survey cases performed at the same soil site, but at two different times, employing the passive and active versions of the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method for an increased investigation depth. In the earlier survey, the modal nature of the imaged dispersion trends from the passive (<20 Hz) and active (>20 Hz) data sets was identified as the fundamental mode, whereas it was confidently re-identified as the first higher mode from the later survey. Modal inspection with the dispersion image created by combining passive and active image data sets was the key to this confident analysis. The modal nature of the passive curve was identified from its context with active curves, whose confident analysis therefore had to come first. An active data set acquired with a small (<1.0 m) receiver spacing and an impact point located close to the receivers appears important for this purpose.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society