Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; September 2005; v. 10; issue. p. 275-286; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG10.3.275
© 2005 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagai, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ashida, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Genetic Algorithm Inversion of Rayleigh Wave Dispersion from CMPCC Gathers Over a Shallow Fault Model

Keiji Nagai, Adam O'Neill*, Yoshinori Sanada and Yuzuru Ashida

1 Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University, KYOTO, 606-8501, Japan
2 keiji{at}tansa.kumst.kyoto-u.ac.jp
3 adam{at}earth.kumst.kyoto-u.ac.jp
4 sanada{at}tansa.kumst.kyoto-u.ac.jp
5 ashida{at}tansa.kumst.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Lateral shear-wave velocity imaging, based on 1D surface wave inversion, is becoming routine in commercial site characterisation. A Genetic Algorithm (GA) is applied to the inversion of fundamental mode Rayleigh wave dispersion over a 3-layered, shallow, vertical-fault model. The data are calculated using a 2D finite difference method, then sorted into CMP cross-correlated (CMPCC) gathers, from which the dispersion is measured. Dispersion is relatively smooth over flat portions of the model, as well as when the spread is equally centered over the sharp lateral discontinuity. When between one and two-fifths of the spread is "overhanging" the fault, low-frequency dispersion is corrupted by wavefield scattering.

Each dispersion curve is inverted using a 1D forward model, constrained to four layers, with parameters allowed to vary within liberal limits except the layer 1 shear-wave velocity. A novel variation is that the optimisation is partially directed, by including the most successful shear-wave velocity model in the initial GA population at successive midpoints, essentially laterally constraining the inversion. When the rollalong dispersion curves are inverted, both in "continuous" and "segmented" progressions, the 2D pseudo-section clearly shows the smoothing effect encountered across a sharp lateral geological discontinuity, causing a "palaeochannel" appearance, rather than a vertical fault. However, the estimated locations of shallow and deep layer truncations can better map the position of the abrupt lateral discontinuity, rather than simply basement topography. The RMS misfit between measured and theoretical dispersion curves gives no indication of where the 1D assumption breaks down and the exact discontinuity lies.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society