Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics; September 2005; v. 10; issue. p. 235-242; DOI: 10.2113/JEEG10.3.235
© 2005 Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asten, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Davenport, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Shear-wave Velocity Profile for Holocene Sediments Measured from Microtremor Array Studies, SCPT, and Seismic Refraction

Michael W. Asten1, W.R. (Bill) Stephenson2 and Peter N. Davenport2

1 Centre for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications of Surface Waves (CEGAS), School of Geosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Email: michael.asten{at}sci.monash.edu.au
2 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences (IGNS), Lower Hutt, New Zealand

The microtremor method was trialed on soft Holocene sediments overlying glacial gravels near the Hutt River, Wellington New Zealand. A triangular four-station array of radius 40 m, processed using a modified spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method was sufficient to establish shear velocity for sediments and gravels, and a thickness of 21.8 m for the soft sediments. The interpretation was performed blind to geological and geophysical data, and subsequent comparison with seismic cone penetrometer and seismic refraction data shows the accuracy from the SPAC interpretation to be better than 5%. Interpretation of horizontal:vertical spectral ratio data assists with estimates of thickness of the glacial gravels (hundreds of meters) but accuracy in thickness is poor, perhaps due to uncertainty in the 2D nature of the base of the gravel-filled glacial valley.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society